Ahmadi, F.F., Ebadi, H., 2009. An Integrated Photogrammetric and Spatial Database Management System for Producing Fully Structured Data Using Aerial and Remote Sensing Images. Sensors 9, 2320–2333. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/s90402320
Baillet, V., Poularakis, I., Farinholt Ward, A., 2021. Photogrammetric modeling and the central ravine of the sanctuary of the great gods, Samothrace. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 20, 173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2021.e00173
Barrile, V., Bernardo, E., Fotia, A., Bilotta, G., 2022. Integration of Laser Scanner, Ground-Penetrating Radar, 3D Models and Mixed Reality for Artistic, Archaeological and Cultural Heritage Dissemination. Heritage 5, 1529–1550. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5030080
Bruseker, G., Carboni, N., Guillem, A., 2017. Cultural Heritage Data Management: The Role of Formal Ontology and CIDOC CRM, in: Vincent, M.L., López-Menchero Bendicho, V.M., Ioannides, M., Levy, T.E. (Eds.), Heritage and Archaeology in the Digital Age: Acquisition, Curation, and Dissemination of Spatial Cultural Heritage Data. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 93–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65370-9_6
Carboni, N., Bruseker, G.T., Guillem, A., Bellido Castañeda, D., Coughenour, C., Domajnko, M., de Kramer, M., Ramos Calles, M., Stathopoulou, E.K., Suma, R., 2016. Data provenance in photogrammetry through documentation protocols. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences III, 57–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-III-5-57-2016
Chatzigrigoriou, P., Nikolakopoulou, V., Vakkas, T., Vosinakis, S., Koutsabasis, P., 2021. Is Architecture Connected with Intangible Cultural Heritage? Reflections from Architectural Digital Documentation and Interactive Application Design in Three Aegean Islands. Heritage 4, 664–689. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4020038
Di Giulio, R., Maietti, F., Piaia, E., Medici, M., Ferrari, F., Turillazzi, B., 2017. Integrated data capturing requirements for 3d semantic modelling of cultural heritage: the inception protocol. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLII-2-W3, 251–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W3-251-2017
Douglass, M., Lin, S., Chodoronek, M., 2015. The Application of 3D Photogrammetry for In-Field Documentation of Archaeological Features. Advances in Archaeological Practice 3, 136–152. https://doi.org/10.7183/2326-3768.3.2.136
Faniel, I., Kansa, E., Whitcher Kansa, S., Barrera-Gomez, J., Yakel, E., 2013. The challenges of digging data: a study of context in archaeological data reuse, in: Downie, S., McDonald, R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL ’13. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 295–304. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2467696.2467712
Fernandez, R., Fernandez, R., The 84th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, 2019. Digital Curation of Photogrammetric Data. https://doi.org/doi:10.6067/XCV8451423,
Freire, N., Valk, S. de, 2019. Automated interpretability of linked data ontologies: : an evaluation within the cultural heritage domain, in: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). Presented at the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp. 3072–3079. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData47090.2019.9005491
Garozzo, R., Murabito, F., Santagati, C., Pino, C., Spampinato, C., 2017. Culto: an ontology-based annotation tool for data curation in cultural heritage. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLII-2-W5, 267–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W5-267-2017
Goodbody, T.R.H., White, J.C., Coops, N.C., LeBoeuf, A., 2021. Benchmarking acquisition parameters for digital aerial photogrammetric data for forest inventory applications: Impacts of image overlap and resolution. Remote Sensing of Environment 265, 112677. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112677
Homburg, T., 2019. Towards Creating A Best Practice Digital Processing Pipeline For Cuneiform Languages. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34894/FKWT9T
Kansa, E.C., Kansa, S.W., 2022. Promoting data quality and reuse in archaeology through collaborative identifier practices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2109313118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109313118
Khalil, A., Stravoravdis, S., 2022. Challenges of Digital Building Data Usage with a Focus on the Digital Documentation of Heritage Buildings—Results from an Online Survey. Heritage 5, 3220–3259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5040166
Klehm, C., 2023. The Use and Challenges of Spatial Data in Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practice 11, 104–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2022.38
Koller, D., Frischer, B., Humphreys, G., 2010. Research challenges for digital archives of 3D cultural heritage models. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 2, 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1658346.1658347
Lauro, V., Lombardo, V., 2023a. A Digital Data Curation-Based Photogrammetric Acquisition Methodology for Cultural Heritage, expanded with CIDOC CRM Compatibility: protocol BeA-PG, in: GCH 2023 - Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage. The Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2312/gch.20231169
Lauro, V., Lombardo, V., 2023b. The Cataloging and Conservation of Digital Survey in Archaeology: A Photogrammetry Protocol in the Context of Digital Data Curation. Heritage 6, 3113–3136. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6030166
Miksa, T., Simms, S., Mietchen, D., Jones, S., 2019. Ten principles for machine-actionable data management plans. PLOS Computational Biology 15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006750
Napolitano, R.K., Scherer, G., Glisic, B., 2018. Virtual tours and informational modeling for conservation of cultural heritage sites. Journal of Cultural Heritage 29, 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.08.007
Pocobelli, D.P., Boehm, J., Bryan, P., Still, J., Grau-Bové, J., 2018. BIM for heritage science: a review. Herit Sci 6, 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-018-0191-4
Quantin, M., Hervy, B., Laroche, F., Kerouanton, J.-L., 2015. Mass customization for cultural heritage 3D models, in: 2015 Digital Heritage. Presented at the 2015 Digital Heritage, pp. 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2015.7419469
Reffat, R., Nofal, E., 2013. Effective communication with cultural heritage using virtual technologies. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XL-5-W2, 519–524. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W2-519-2013
Remondino, F., 2011. Heritage Recording and 3D Modeling with Photogrammetry and 3D Scanning. Remote Sensing 3, 1104–1138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3061104
Rodríguez-Martín, M., Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, P., 2020. Suitability of Automatic Photogrammetric Reconstruction Configurations for Small Archaeological Remains. Sensors 20, 2936. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102936
Vlachidis, A., Bikakis, A., Kyriaki-Manessi, D., Triantafyllou, I., Antoniou, A., 2017. The CrossCult Knowledge Base: A Co-inhabitant of Cultural Heritage Ontology and Vocabulary Classification, in: Kirikova, M., Nørvåg, K., Papadopoulos, G.A., Gamper, J., Wrembel, R., Darmont, J., Rizzi, S. (Eds.), New Trends in Databases and Information Systems. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 353–362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67162-8_35
Yaworsky, P.M., Vernon, K.B., Spangler, J.D., Brewer, S.C., Codding, B.F., 2020. Advancing predictive modeling in archaeology: An evaluation of regression and machine learning methods on the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. PLOS ONE 15, e0239424. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239424