3D-Icons, 2014. 3D-ICONS Guidelines & Case Studies.
Adamopoulos, E., Rinaudo, F., Ardissono, L., 2021. A critical comparison of 3D digitization techniques for heritage objects. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 10, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10010010
Artec3D, 2024a. HD Mode for 3D Scanners. Powered by Artec 3D AI Engine [WWW Document]. URL https://www.artec3d.com/portable-3d-scanners/hd-mode
Artec3D, 2024b. Operating Conditions for Artec 3D Scanners [WWW Document]. URL https://support.artec3d.com/hc/en-us/articles/207741015-Operating-conditions-for-Artec-3D-scanners
Artec3D, 2023. Artec Studio 18 User Guide [WWW Document]. URL https://docs.artec-group.com/as/18/en/
Athanasiou, E., Faka, M., Hermon, S., Vassallo, V., Yiakoupi, K., 2013. 3D documentation pipeline of Cultural Heritage artifacts: A cross-disciplinary implementation, in: Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage). pp. 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2013.6743724
Bezzi, L., Bezzi, A., Gietl, R., Moraes, C., Naponiello, G., Airò, S., Putzer, A., Silvestri, E., 2024. Digital twins of archaeological finds: open source technologies applied to 3D scanning. Archeologia e Calcolatori 35, 203–214. https://doi.org/10.19282/ac.35.2.2024.22
Bosco, A., 2022. 3D Surveying Methods and Digital Information Management for Archaeological Heritage. BAR Publishing, London.
Brize, P., Schulz-Brize, T., Söğüt, B., 2024. Neue Überlegungen zur Anbringung der Inschriften am Hekate-Tempel von Lagina. Archäologischer Anzeiger 1–56. https://doi.org/10.34780/8df0-09fd
Campana, S., Remondino, F., 2014. 3D Recording and Modelling in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage - Theory and Best Practices, in: Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. Theory and Best Practices, BAR International Series 2598. BAR International Series 2598, Oxford.
Carlson, E.S., 2014. Representation and structure conflict in the digital age: Reassessing archaeological illustration and the use of cubist techniques in depicting images of the past. Advances in Archaeological Practice 2, 269–284. https://doi.org/10.7183/2326-3768.2.4.269
Cerasoni, J.N., Do Nascimento Rodrigues, F., Tang, Y., Hallett, E.Y., 2022. Do-It-Yourself digital archaeology: Introduction and practical applications of photography and photogrammetry for the 2D and 3D representation of small objects and artefacts. PLOS ONE 17, e0267168. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267168
Changes, 2024. CHANGES: Cultural Heritage Innovation for Next-Gen Sustainable Society [WWW Document]. URL https://www.fondazionechanges.org/
Delpiano, D., 2021. Antiche e moderne tecnologie: l’applicazione delle tecniche di rilevamento tridimensionale per la rappresentazione e l’analisi dei manufatti litici. AeC 32, 43–62. https://doi.org/10.19282/ac.32.1.2021.03
Demetrescu, E., Ferdani, D., 2021. From Field Archaeology to Virtual Reconstruction: A Five Steps Method Using the Extended Matrix. Applied Sciences 11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115206
Di Maida, G., Hattermann, M., Delpiano, D., 2023. 3D models of lithic artefacts: A test on their efficacy. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 30, e00279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2023.e00279
Diara, F., 2024. Data extraction from 3D scanning: post-processing filtering for analytic and informative models of small archaeological finds. Archeologia e Calcolatori 35, 225–234. https://doi.org/10.19282/ac.35.2.2024.24
Diara, F., 2023. Structured-Light Scanning and Metrological Analysis for Archaeology: Quality Assessment of Artec 3D Solutions for Cuneiform Tablets. Heritage 6, 6016–6034. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6090317
Duman, B., Ismaelli, T., Bozza, S., 2024. Il Ninfeo Monumentale di Tripolis: primi risultati tra ricostruzione storica, conservazione e valorizzazione, in: La Ricerca Archeologica per La Ricostruzione Storica e La Valorizzazione Del Patrimonio, XIII Convegno Sul Contributo Italiano a Scavi, Ricerche e Studi Nelle Missioni Archeologiche in Turchia. Istituto Italiano di Cultura di Istanbul, pp. 174–189.
Europeana, 2024. Discover Europe’s Digital Cultural Heritage [WWW Document]. URL https://www.europeana.eu/en
Galli, M., Ismaelli, T., 2022. Basilica Iulia I: gli scavi di Laura Fabbrini (1960-1964): strutture, stratigrafie e materiali dalla prima età repubblicana alla costruzione Augustea. Ege Yayinlari, Istanbul.
García-Molina, D.F., López-Lago, S., Hidalgo-Fernandez, R.E., Triviño-Tarradas, P., 2021. Digitalization and 3D Documentation Techniques Applied to Two Pieces of Visigothic Sculptural Heritage in Merida Through Structured Light Scanning. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 14, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3427381
Gilboa, A., Tal, A., Shimshoni, I., Kolomenkin, M., 2013. Computer-based, automatic recording and illustration of complex archaeological artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Science 40, 1329–1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.09.018
Göldner, D., Karakostis, F.A., Falcucci, A., 2022. Practical and technical aspects for the 3D scanning of lithic artefacts using micro-computed tomography techniques and laser light scanners for subsequent geometric morphometric analysis. Introducing the StyroStone protocol. PLOS ONE 17, e0267163. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267163
Göttlich, F., Schmitt, A., Kilian, A., Gries, H., Badreshany, K., 2021. A new method for the large-scale documentation of pottery sherds through simultaneous multiple 3D model capture using Structure from Motion. Open Archaeology 7, 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2020-0133
Historic England, 2018a. Multi-light Imaging. Highlight-Reflectance Transformation Imaging (H-RTI) for Cultural Heritage.
Historic England, 2018b. 3D Laser Scanning for Heritage. Advice and Guidance On The Use Of Laser Scanning in Archaeology and Architecture.
Historic England, 2017. Photogrammetric Applications for Cultural Heritage. Guidance for Good Practice.
Hostettler, M., Buhlke, A., Drummer, C., Emmenegger, L., Reich, J.R., Stäheli, C. (Eds.), 2024. The 3 Dimensions of Digitalised Archaeology: State-of-the-Art, Data Management and Current Challenges in Archaeological 3D-Documentation. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/1
Kadıoğlu, M. (Ed.), 2021. Teos: Inscriptions, Cults, and Urban Fabric. Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, Istanbul.
Kadıoğlu, M., Özbil, C., Adak, M., Yenice, G., Ergin, H., Halit Bora, Ç., Bozoğlan, O., Bozoğlan, S., Uluger, T., Aydin, G., Ismaelli, T., Bozza, S., 2022. 2019 ve 2020 yılları Teos çalışmaları (10-11. sezonlar). Presented at the 2019-2020 Yılı Kazı Çalışmaları, Ankara, pp. 309–328.
Karasik, A., Smilansky, U., 2008. 3D scanning technology as a standard archaeological tool for pottery analysis: Practice and theory. Journal of Archaeological Science 35, 1148–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2007.08.008
Kleinitz, C., Bauer, T., Näser, C., 2009. Optische 3D-Messungen zur digitalen Bestandsdokumentation von dekorierten Bauelementen und Sekundärbildern der Großen Anlage von Musawwarat es Sufra: ein Pilotprojekt, in: Der antike Sudan. Sudanarchäologischen Gesellschaft zu Berlin, Berlin, pp. 33–48.
Magnani, M., Douglass, M., Porter, S.T., 2016. Closing the seams: resolving frequently encountered issues in photogrammetric modelling. Antiquity 90, 1654–1669. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2016.211
Magnani, M., Douglass, M., Schroder, W., Reeves, J., Braun, D.R., 2020. The Digital Revolution to Come: Photogrammetry in Archaeological Practice. American Antiquity 85, 737–760. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2020.59
McPherron, S.P., Gernat, T., Hublin, J.-J., 2009. Structured light scanning for high-resolution documentation of in situ archaeological finds. Journal of Archaeological Science 36, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2008.06.028
Naga Project, 2024. Naga Project [WWW Document]. URL https://naga-projekt.de/das-grabungsprojekt/
Orsi, M., Fusco, R., Mazzucchi, A., Taglioretti, R., Marinato, M., Licata, M., 2024. Development of a scanning protocol for anthropological remains: A preliminary study. Heritage 7, 4997–5006. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7090236
Pendić, J., Molloy, B., 2024. The use of 3D documentation for investigating archaeological artefacts, in: Hostettler, M., Buhlke, A., Drummer, C., Emmenegger, L., Reich, J., Stäheli, C. (Eds.), The 3 Dimensions of Digitalised Archaeology: State-of-the-Art, Data Management and Current Challenges in Archaeological 3D-Documentation. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53032-6_2
Porter, S.T., Roussel, M., Soressi, M., 2016. A Simple Photogrammetry Rig for the Reliable Creation of 3D Artifact Models in the Field: Lithic Examples from the Early Upper Paleolithic Sequence of Les Cottés (France). Advances in Archaeological Practice 4, 71–86. https://doi.org/10.7183/2326-3768.4.1.71
Quatember, U., Kalasek, R., 2011. Handaufmass gegen High Tech: zur Aufnahme eines kassettierten Tonnengewölbes aus Ephesos. Presented at the Von Handaufmass bis High Tech III, von Zabern, Darmstadt-Mainz, pp. 195–200.
Richards-Rissetto, H., von Schwerin, J., 2017. A catch 22 of 3D data sustainability: Lessons in 3D archaeological data management & accessibility. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 6, 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2017.04.005
Ruiz, R., Torres, M.T.M., Allegue, P.S., 2022. Comparative analysis between the main 3D scanning techniques: Photogrammetry, terrestrial laser scanner, and structured light scanner in religious imagery. The case of The Holy Christ of the Blood. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 15, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3469126
Sapirstein, P., 2018. A high-precision photogrammetric recording system for small artifacts. Journal of Cultural Heritage 31, 33–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.10.011
Sapirstein, P., Murray, S., 2017. Establishing Best Practices for Photogrammetric Recording During Archaeological Fieldwork. Journal of Field Archaeology 42, 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2017.1338513
Schäfer, A., Leitte, H., Bock, H.G., 2016. Ein automatisches und virtuelles 3D-Puzzle von Khmer-Tempeln im Angkorstil, in: 3D-Anwendungen in Der Archäologie: Computeranwendungen Und Quantitative Methoden in Der Archäologie. Edition Topoi, pp. 59–76.
Siebke, I., Campana, L., Ramstein, M., Furtwängler, A., Hafner, A., Lösch, S., 2018. The application of different 3D-scan-systems and photogrammetry at an excavation. A Neolithic dolmen from Switzerland. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 10, e00078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2018.e00078
Slizewski, A., Semal, P., 2009. Experiences with low and high cost 3D surface scanner. Quartär 56, 131–138.
Williams, R., Thompson, T., Orr, C., Birley, A., Taylor, G., 2019. 3D imaging as a public engagement tool: Investigating an ox cranium used in target practice at Vindolanda. Theoretical Roman Archaeology Journal 2. https://doi.org/10.16995/traj.364
Williams, R., Thompson, T., Orr, C., Taylor, G., 2024. Developing a 3D strategy: Pipelines and recommendations for 3D structured light scanning of archaeological artefacts. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 33, e00338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2024.e00338